tiagoakachimp

I feel badly about having to rate this as a 1 star. Here are the reasons why I didn't like it: 1. The grammar was poor enough that I could detect it and wanted to make corrections. This is sad as most people know me for not caring about this much. For me to notice it, it is not a good sign. 2. First person from a male professor didn't do it for me. 3. Repetition of the no fuck rule between Professors and Co-eds in every chapter became tedious. 4. The familiar vernacular used in this story became increasingly distracting. Examples are "soooo very" and "you know". 5. What is becumming? The concept of this book was interesting. I like the professor with a naughty co-ed. I'd like it more if the co-ed coerced the professor or vice versa into sex. The entire book was about the professor whining about the rule against fornication between a professor and a student. This was unappealing for me. For me, the book came across as a cock tease with very little delivery. The long sentences mixed with big words caused the book to stutter instead of flow. I wanted to enjoy it since the author is new to us and a member of the group. Unfortunately, I was not able to enjoy the book. Recommendations: 1. Some smut readers also read classical literature, so make sure the story contains a well constructed plot. Contrary to popular believe, sex in a story won't carry the book, even for those of us who enjoy sex scene after sex scene. 2. Repetition is good for learning new skills, not in books. 3. Grammar does matter. Please also have a proof reader go through and use proper spelling. There is some leniency with the word "cum", but when words are spelled as if it were over a text message, this is distracting from the story line. 4. Using first person from a man's viewpoint is gusty. Make sure the male is an alpha if you chose this path. Women do operate on baser instincts too. We like the strong decisive man, taking control in fantasies, especially steamy fantasy.

2022-11-14 16:20